<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Notebook Paper: How to Spot High-Quality Paper	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.paperblanks.com/2012/02/notebooks-paper-quality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.paperblanks.com/2012/02/notebooks-paper-quality/</link>
	<description>Expression has no limits.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 20:41:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.7.15</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Biao		</title>
		<link>https://blog.paperblanks.com/2012/02/notebooks-paper-quality/#comment-59614</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Biao]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 12:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paperblanks.com/?p=3323#comment-59614</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Those were very helpful tips. You covered the topic comprehensively. 

Kudos.

Keep penning!
Biao]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those were very helpful tips. You covered the topic comprehensively. </p>
<p>Kudos.</p>
<p>Keep penning!<br />
Biao</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cora		</title>
		<link>https://blog.paperblanks.com/2012/02/notebooks-paper-quality/#comment-52268</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cora]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 20:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paperblanks.com/?p=3323#comment-52268</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The quality of Paperblanks pages is not to be denied. Everything stated above holds absolutely true, and I was very much impressed. I found very few things on the “par” level – EVERYTHING else (and there are a awful lot of things in the category of “other stuff”) was beyond exceptional.

The covers are undeniably attractive. While the images are beautiful, nothing compares to holding it in your hands. At first I was a little uncertain of them as the “leather” books aren’t real leather (this seemed odd to me, and I was worried that the mix-up of looks versus reality would put me off), but once I was able to handle them in person, I immediately found that I prefer them even to genuine leather (as those can be ruined easily, and that doesn’t seem to be the case with these!) The covers also act as a shield for the edges of the papers. 

The paper holds up very well under an eraser, and I was pleased to discover that the lines of the paper can disappear after a bit of rubbing -- very handy if one writes in ink and wants to write in straight lines where the guides can later be erased. The paper also takes exceptionally well to any sort of writing utensil, and I don’t say that lightly. It feels smooth to the touch, but has a nice grip – maybe even the “perfect” grip, which delighted me to no end. It’s really not every day you see any sort of paper available to write on with such astounding quality.

The watermarked lines (both for sizing columns and for regulating the height of letters) were a delightful surprise that I love to take full advantage of. They aren&#039;t very noticeable except at an angle in bright lighting, so they never detract from the reading experience later on.

The little extra tidbits – the ribbon marker and the compartment in the back – are both useful and appealing in appearance. It makes a nice touch that seems to round out the whole journaling experience. 

I could fill an entire Paperblanks journal with how much I love these books and why – but that doesn’t mean there isn’t at all anything on the “par” level, as mentioned before. There only seem to be three, and they&#039;re minor ones at that: 

1. I tend to write firmly no matter what, which creates an indent to show up on the other side of the page and sometimes on the next page as well. If you&#039;re writing on the opposite side, these impressions can transfer pencil lead and ink to the page under it. Upon erasing, the impressions are visible even under the new writing, which makes for a slightly messy look (as does the ink/lead transfer). This sort of thing happens with lesser-quality journals as well, so I shan’t grumble too much. I’ve taken to fitting an ultra-thin, flat, and unyielding journal-sized plate (similar to a clipboard, sans clip) under the page I’m using, which eliminates both problems entirely. I may be the only one to notice or care about such things, but in case I’m not, I do think the idea of Paperblanks possibly offering an optional, appropriately sized writing board even for an added cost for people like me would be absolutely grand.  

2. When turning pages, some inner corners where it connects to the binding fold upwards and out. This isn&#039;t really a huge problem, as the page corner is easy tucked back in again, but I wonder about the strength of binding and fear the possibility of accidental crimping.

3. The very first lined page is connected near the binding to the colorful flyleaf (which I love for both the aesthetics and the privacy it lends to the journal) and won’t lie flat until you turn the page. The journal tends to open to the second and third pages on its own, even, which almost negates the idea of using the first page at all. I’m tempted to try to pry the flyleaf and the first lined sheet apart, but I worry about damaging the journal in the attempt.  

On a scale of 1-10, I would still give Paperblanks journals a 9.99 repeating and they deserve every recommendation and bit of praise. The journals are of the most astounding quality, and three minor annoyances in a sea of merits are certainly not enough to turn me off. Hands down, these are still the best journals I’ve ever laid my mitts on… I’m simply very particular and admittedly snooty about the three things mentioned above.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The quality of Paperblanks pages is not to be denied. Everything stated above holds absolutely true, and I was very much impressed. I found very few things on the “par” level – EVERYTHING else (and there are a awful lot of things in the category of “other stuff”) was beyond exceptional.</p>
<p>The covers are undeniably attractive. While the images are beautiful, nothing compares to holding it in your hands. At first I was a little uncertain of them as the “leather” books aren’t real leather (this seemed odd to me, and I was worried that the mix-up of looks versus reality would put me off), but once I was able to handle them in person, I immediately found that I prefer them even to genuine leather (as those can be ruined easily, and that doesn’t seem to be the case with these!) The covers also act as a shield for the edges of the papers. </p>
<p>The paper holds up very well under an eraser, and I was pleased to discover that the lines of the paper can disappear after a bit of rubbing &#8212; very handy if one writes in ink and wants to write in straight lines where the guides can later be erased. The paper also takes exceptionally well to any sort of writing utensil, and I don’t say that lightly. It feels smooth to the touch, but has a nice grip – maybe even the “perfect” grip, which delighted me to no end. It’s really not every day you see any sort of paper available to write on with such astounding quality.</p>
<p>The watermarked lines (both for sizing columns and for regulating the height of letters) were a delightful surprise that I love to take full advantage of. They aren&#8217;t very noticeable except at an angle in bright lighting, so they never detract from the reading experience later on.</p>
<p>The little extra tidbits – the ribbon marker and the compartment in the back – are both useful and appealing in appearance. It makes a nice touch that seems to round out the whole journaling experience. </p>
<p>I could fill an entire Paperblanks journal with how much I love these books and why – but that doesn’t mean there isn’t at all anything on the “par” level, as mentioned before. There only seem to be three, and they&#8217;re minor ones at that: </p>
<p>1. I tend to write firmly no matter what, which creates an indent to show up on the other side of the page and sometimes on the next page as well. If you&#8217;re writing on the opposite side, these impressions can transfer pencil lead and ink to the page under it. Upon erasing, the impressions are visible even under the new writing, which makes for a slightly messy look (as does the ink/lead transfer). This sort of thing happens with lesser-quality journals as well, so I shan’t grumble too much. I’ve taken to fitting an ultra-thin, flat, and unyielding journal-sized plate (similar to a clipboard, sans clip) under the page I’m using, which eliminates both problems entirely. I may be the only one to notice or care about such things, but in case I’m not, I do think the idea of Paperblanks possibly offering an optional, appropriately sized writing board even for an added cost for people like me would be absolutely grand.  </p>
<p>2. When turning pages, some inner corners where it connects to the binding fold upwards and out. This isn&#8217;t really a huge problem, as the page corner is easy tucked back in again, but I wonder about the strength of binding and fear the possibility of accidental crimping.</p>
<p>3. The very first lined page is connected near the binding to the colorful flyleaf (which I love for both the aesthetics and the privacy it lends to the journal) and won’t lie flat until you turn the page. The journal tends to open to the second and third pages on its own, even, which almost negates the idea of using the first page at all. I’m tempted to try to pry the flyleaf and the first lined sheet apart, but I worry about damaging the journal in the attempt.  </p>
<p>On a scale of 1-10, I would still give Paperblanks journals a 9.99 repeating and they deserve every recommendation and bit of praise. The journals are of the most astounding quality, and three minor annoyances in a sea of merits are certainly not enough to turn me off. Hands down, these are still the best journals I’ve ever laid my mitts on… I’m simply very particular and admittedly snooty about the three things mentioned above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris Zawadzki		</title>
		<link>https://blog.paperblanks.com/2012/02/notebooks-paper-quality/#comment-39955</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Zawadzki]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paperblanks.com/?p=3323#comment-39955</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.paperblanks.com/2012/02/notebooks-paper-quality/#comment-39808&quot;&gt;Bret&lt;/a&gt;.

You are correct, Bret. :) Feathering does occur because of course fibers and as a result of a capillary effect. The effect spreads the ink away from where its supposed to go. I suppose what we meant to communicate was that feathering has the *appearance* of smearing. Good catch! :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://blog.paperblanks.com/2012/02/notebooks-paper-quality/#comment-39808">Bret</a>.</p>
<p>You are correct, Bret. 🙂 Feathering does occur because of course fibers and as a result of a capillary effect. The effect spreads the ink away from where its supposed to go. I suppose what we meant to communicate was that feathering has the *appearance* of smearing. Good catch! 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Wendy		</title>
		<link>https://blog.paperblanks.com/2012/02/notebooks-paper-quality/#comment-39831</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wendy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 02:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paperblanks.com/?p=3323#comment-39831</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You have great comments about picking the right journal to write in.  Thanks for sharing it. :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have great comments about picking the right journal to write in.  Thanks for sharing it. 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bret		</title>
		<link>https://blog.paperblanks.com/2012/02/notebooks-paper-quality/#comment-39808</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bret]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 19:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paperblanks.com/?p=3323#comment-39808</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I always thought feathering was the ink being absorbed into coarse paper fibers via a capillary effect, rather than surface smearing, and that coated paper or paper with a finer &quot;grain&quot; avoided this.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always thought feathering was the ink being absorbed into coarse paper fibers via a capillary effect, rather than surface smearing, and that coated paper or paper with a finer &#8220;grain&#8221; avoided this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
